Hi all !
I think I have the same problem. Only on linux, when I shutdown my
server and try to restart it immediatly I got an Address Already In Use
message.
I use unbindAll too. I wonder if unbindAll is synchronous. I mean after
calling it may I consider that the port is unbound or no ? Trustin, you
ask about "capturing the full thread dump" after the call, What do you
mean and how can I do this ?
Thks for your help
Nicolas
Uday Prakash (DHL CZ) a écrit :
Hi Trustin,
Thank you for that suggestion, I shall look into it.
-U
-----Original Message-----
From: Trustin Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 4:27 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Shutting down a server elegantly
Hi Uday,
On 3/21/07, Uday Prakash (DHL CZ) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I've been working on a small tcp/ip server, that listens for specific
messages and then depending on the message type performs a particular
task. That was the easy part, I was looking into shutting down the
server in an elegant manner. I decided that I'll be listening on a
particular port say 'SHUTDOWN_PORT' and when I receive a pre-defined
message to shutdown, I shall shut the server down.
To do so, I call on acceptor.unbindAll() and shutdown the executor
services. As the documentation points, but what I see is that the
threads continue to stay alive. Is there something I'm doing wrong?
A little direction would help.
All remaining threads should be daemon threads once the port is
unbound, and therefore the VM should exit automatically. If the VM
doesn't exit automatically, please capture the full thread dump after
unbindAll() operation, and send it here so we can analyze the cause of
the problem.
HTH,
Trustin
--
******************************************************************
Nicolas Froment [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Architect
Hi-Stor Technologies www.histor.fr
23 bd Victor Hugo Std: +33 (0) 562 12 14 40 (Voice)
Bâtiment Socrate Fax: +33 (0) 562 12 14 49
31770 Colomiers
FRANCE
****************************************************************
