So how to reassembly the compression message if using fixed length payload?
2007/5/5, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I agree with Ashish. This provides the most flexibility. On 5/5/07, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/5/07, Ashish Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i think have a constant size header which will contain payload length > > for rest of message. > > > I agree, this is very easy to implement. > > > On 5/5/07, mat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Can anyone help me out with my protocol design? Is it better to design > > > protocol as a fixed length or non fixed length? What I meant is fixed > > lenght > > > message(for instance 512bytes) for each message? Non fixed length means > > the > > > message size could be big. Which method is better? If fixed length, i > > faced > > > a problem. How to reassembly the message since message is cut into the > > > piece? > > > > > > -- ..Cheers Mark
