its strange to see how x vs y wars can generate so many responses.
if they are good we can adapt, if we are good we have nothing to worry. On 5/25/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Holger, On 5/25/07, Holger Hoffstaette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2007 08:45:34 +0900, Trustin Lee wrote: > > > The HEAD revision of AsyncWeb highly depends on MINA and had significant > > performance improvement. It seems like they used older release (or didn't > > use a lightweight asyncweb example). Moreover, I don't think MINA doesn't > > have any noticeably big margin for improvement in performance, at least > > from the following performance test report. > > > > http://mina.apache.org/performance-test-reports.html > > That's a fantastic report! However it would be fair to the poor old Apache > if you enabled mod_cache and used a newer version (2.2) with a threaded > mpm - I assume you ran the worker model? While that is popular for > deployments for many good reasons, it's not a fair comparison to what Mina > does. > Other than that keep up the great work :) Thanks for pointing out the issues with my tests. I'd like to run the test again with more powerful machines and update the report someday. Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
