OK great. I think I'll go with that assumption and just fix it if I ever see it break, in which case I'll report back.
Many thanks. -Adam On 8/22/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/23/07, Adam Fisk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering if anyone knows if there are guarantees that a each call > to > > DatagramChannel.write(ByteBuffer src) *always* results in the sending of > a > > single datagram. In all my tests this is the case, but I'm not sure if > it's > > operating system-specific. > > > > More specifically, can 2 calls to DatagramChannel.write(ByteBuffer src) > get > > consolidated into the sending of a single datagram on the wire? I know > the > > DatagramChannel.write(ByteBuffer[] srcs) call will consolidate them, but > it > > at least appears that calling write for individual buffers sends each in > its > > own datagram. > > > > Possibly I shouldn't rely on this behavior? Anyone have any experience > with > > this? > > AFAIK, you are safe to assume one write call sends a single datagram. > > HTH, > Trustin > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6 >
