On Dec 11, 2007 11:35 PM, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very interesting because I have also been working on a MINA based appender ! > I haven't done extensive testing yet, and haven't run into that problem yet. > probably because the MINA code was not emitting logging events > (log-levels not high enough)
Wow, what a coincidance! > But I was also worried about the cyclic dependency ... > I was going to ask Ceki for advice (I will probably also create a > LogBack appender) Yep cyclic dependency is a problem along with the dead lock. I think we need to get rid of both somehow. > Maybe it is be possible to create a org.apache.log4j.spi.Filter that > denies all logging events coming from MINA-threads ? I think it's not a good idea because MINA has right to say something to a logging framework. :D Trustin -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/ -- PGP Key ID: 0x0255ECA6
