For my product, I am using the 2.x code because I feel that there are enough of a difference that I do not want to have to change code once 2.x is relesed. Plus this allows us to familiarize ourselves with one version instead of 2.
On Dec 12, 2007 10:27 AM, Maarten Bosteels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMO, you would be better off refactoring to a current snapshot of MINA > 2.x(or wait for > 2.0-M1) > > My company has a mission-critical application running on a snapshot of > MINA-2.0 from some months ago, without problems. > So I would say that the word 'stable' on > http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html refers primarily to (lack of) > changes > to the API. > > Note that this is my very personal opinion (and contradicting the FAQ) > Don't blame me when the latest snapshot isn't working for you :-) > > Maarten > > On Dec 12, 2007 3:24 PM, mclovis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > We currently have NIO server code working based on our own current > > design. > > Looking at the Mina code we feel we could simplify things somewhat by > > switching to Mina. We are also currently in a refactoring phase. That > > being > > said it looks like you will release Mina2 -M1 soon and have promised GA > by > > summer. In your opinion, could we refactor to Mina1 for production > quality > > and later upgrade with some changes to Mina2 , or wait to M2. If we are > > going to refactor using Mina in the near future, now is the time for us. > I > > am posting this trying gain some understanding of Mina1 to Mina2 > features > > as > > well as compatibility. Any insights will be appreciated. > > -- > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Mina-1-vs-Mina-2-current-tp14296037s16868p14296037.html > > Sent from the Apache MINA Support Forum mailing list archive at > Nabble.com > > . > > > > > -- -------------------------------- The adjuration to be "normal" seems shockingly repellent to me; I see neither hope nor comfort in sinking to that low level. I think it is ignorance that makes people think of abnormality only with horror and allows them to remain undismayed at the proximity of "normal" to average and mediocre. For surely anyone who achieves anything is, essentially, abnormal. Dr. Karl Menninger
