Not sure. I think I would run both cases and see which one performs better. I would guess that putting the compression in the IoHandler would be faster though.
On Jan 8, 2008 10:47 AM, Steve Johns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 8, 2008 11:08 PM, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The suggested way is to put the ExecutorFilter *after* the codec filter. > > See http://mina.apache.org/configuring-thread-model.html, specifically > > the > > "Where should I put an ExecutorFilter in an IoFilterChain?" section. > > > > --Mark > > > Thanks. Mark. Actually I did read it before. My question is: whether I > consider to put my 50ms compression into a ExecutorFilter instead of > combined with protocol filter? They are both CPU-bound works. > > On Jan 8, 2008 4:14 AM, Steve Johns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > 1) When I consider I need a ExecutorFilter such as compression? It tooks > > 50ms to compression my data. > > > 2) I did the Compression in my codec filter. Should I add an > > ExecutorFilter before codec filter? > > Thanks. > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------- > > Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one > else > > can see. > > > -- -------------------------------- Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
