Thanks Jeff. Actually I was going to start refactoring it tomorrow while checking various legal matters so we can start releasing some candidates. I'll keep you updated.
I'd love to see a rich community start to grow around asyncweb as it did around MINA. It's got a lot of potential and there are many users out there even as it is. However the present direction with pushing protocols into MINA core is somewhat of an issue which will distract from this goal. Alex On Jan 20, 2008 1:07 PM, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I personally don't know what is going on but I really like AsyncWeb and > would love to see it come out of the sandbox. I would be happy to also > help refactoring it. > > Jeff > > Alex Karasulu wrote: > >> Do you have any idea on when we can release MINA proper 2.0 M1. I ask > >> this because I would like to see at least some beta release of asyncweb > >> which depends on it? Furthermore we probably need to move it out of > the > >> sandbox now that the IP has been cleared but it needs some work. I > will > >> start cleaning it up to get it ready for some kind of beta release. > >> > >> Also are we bound to maintain the MINA API between milestone releases? > >> > > > > Any comment? Anyone besides Trustin know what's going on? > > > > If releases without freezing the API are not possible then we might have > an > > issue with this model. > > > > Alex > > >
