Actually I already made a Mina 2.x version that is in the G sandbox ;-)
Jeff
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Mike Heath wrote:
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Hi,
Please excuse the cross post but it's quite necessary. Furthermore
people
should not feel like they cannot cross post responses so please feel
free.
It looks like the two versions of the http client based on MINA are
starting
to diverge. I've noticed the other day that some of the fixes for bugs
already solved by one group are being re-implement all over again
over again
by another. It's a shame to have that happen so perhaps we can take
some
concrete steps to prevent this divergence from progressing.
As a first step I've cleaned up and restructured the Asyncweb code
base and
posted this email here on the new directory structure in Subversion:
*http://tinyurl.com/ypmbd3
*So I'm sending out this cross post in the hopes of bringing the two
groups
together as one unified community which apparently has the same goal in
mind: a fast low-resource consuming asynchronous http client. What
ever it
takes, I'm sure the MINA PMC is more than willing to accommodate. If
you
have trusted committers already working on this in the Geronimo
community
there is no reason why we cannot trust them to continue working on it
here
at MINA's Asyncweb project. Let's open up discussions on this.
I totally agree with Alex on this. It looks there are fixes in the G
branch that haven't made it to the MINA branch. How can bridge the gap
in communication as well as the gap in bug fixing?
My opinion is that we need to stop all work on the G sandbox branch and
move all work over to MINA. Is there anything impeding that? ...besides
a lot of work merging the changes...
Thanks Alex and Mike.
So, as we discussed the last time, the community members that have been
active in this area are Jeff Genender, Sangjin Lee, and Rick McGuire.
You already know Jeff. Have you reached out to Sangjin and Rick? I'd
urge them both to become involved in the Mina community, as their time
and interest permit.
Personally, I'm certainly in favor of seeing a united effort in creating
an async http client. Mina would seem to be a natural home for this
support (since Mina 2.x is moving up the stack and implementing
protocols). I think our community would be quite happy to receive this
capability by consumng Mina technology. Given the current state of our
two projects, I think it's somewhat doubtful that the Geronimo project
will end up releasing the AsyncHTTPClient code in our sandbox.
I can understand, however, if Rick and Sangjin see value in the current
codebase -- being based on a released version of Mina (1.1.2) and
perhaps at a different point in terms of stability and function. I
suspect that this might be part of the reason why they haven't become
involved in the 2.x development work occurring at Mina.
So, one possible solution that occurs to me is to transfer the current
1.1.x code in Geronimo sandbox to the Mina project. This might allow
Rick and Sangjin to complete their work on the current codebase and also
ease their transition towards merging code and fixes into the Mina 2.x
codebase. Alternatively, we can leave the code in Geronimo sandbox while
Sangjin and Rick transition their focus to the Mina 2.x support.
Will leave it to the Mina project, Rick, and Sangjin to say what makes
the most sense.
--kevan
