Just so that I fully understand the proposal. The stuff you want to remove are the ReadThrottleFilter and WriteThrottleFilter and associated classes? Would you like them removed for 2.0 due to them not being sufficiently mature and then bring them back later as they get better. Or do you want them removed for good?
Given that there has been some questions here on this topic (people getting OOM exceptions), some type of recommendation/solution should be provided, right? Documentation that explains how to do it in the OS IP stack would be fine for me. Or I might be misunderstanding your proposal completly :-) /niklas On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:31 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to propose to drop the current traffic throttling filters from > 2.0. The reasoning behind this proposal is: > > 1) Traffic throttling is very difficult to implement - our implementation > seems to be buggy. > 2) Most operating systems already provide QoS stack. > > Of course, this doesn't mean we have to drop existing overload prevention > mechanism included in OrderedThreadPoolExecutor and > UnorderedThreadPoolExecutor. > > WDYT? > > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ >
