Hello,
2008/4/4, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > For WRITE_IDLE, I don't know if it is relevant. > > If so, then I would suggest to make two kind of filter, one for > READ_IDLE > > and another one for WRITER_IDLE, so the user can choose one or the other > > or both. > > I'm not sure what we can do with WRITER_IDLE for sending keep-alive > messages. Could you give me some scenarios? I might be missing an important point, but isn't the WRITE_IDLE status much more relevant for sendinvg keep-alive messages? I mean, "normally" servers do not send keepalive messages but clients do. In particular, they send them when the application logic which is utilising MINA has no "data" messages to send but wants to hold the connection, because "normally" servers close "inactive" connections after a certain amount of time. Sorry if i misunderstood something completely. best regards, christian!
