2008/4/9 Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > sounds like that is the direction we want to go. My only concern is that we > start getting apps in the examples directory that overlap. There is > currently a chat program in examples, but maybe your's is more feature-rich > or more robust. One think I do like about the current chat example is that > it is the only example that uses Spring.
No it's certainly not more feature rich, it's probably the stupidest chat server ever built. The purpose was to make it as simple as possible to be able to communicate it during a talk. /niklas
