I also like the idea of specifying the revision number for the releases... Thanks, Sangjin
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 8:14 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > > Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:28 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> All fixes have been applied to both branch without any difference. > The > >>> two releases we are going to cut are basically backward-compatible > bug > >>> fix releases, so I don't see any reason to postpone them. > >>> > >>> Let's hope this is the last vote for 1.x releases. :) > >>> > >> > >> Are the binaries available for review? If possible, I would prefer to > >> be able to review the binaries before casting my vote. > >> > >> /niklas > >> > > Yeah, that would be cool to have. > > > > Also David Jencks on Directory project suggested that every vote should > > be related to at least a revision number, otherwise we have no way to be > > sure what we are working on. I know we never did it before, but I just > > mention it because it seems sane to do so. > > > > wdyt ? > > Yeah, I also tried that approach once, but was too lazy to do it once > again. :) Let me upload snapshot build and specify revision number > soon... > > Thanks, > -- > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > >
