Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > I have also some concerns about some classes which should have been > removed or deprecated. There where a convo two years ao about pooled > ByteBuffer, where we stated that it was dubious, and can be removed. I > see no reason to keep those pooled BB into the 2.0 code base, if we have > a chance to remove it before the first RC.
? The pooling already has been removed loooooooooooooooooooong time ago. -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
