The source link sounds good. What about using the old wiki site which can be edited by everyone? We could use it as a kind of sandbox and copy some pages when they become mature. Otherwise, We could create a dedicated CWiki space which allows all logged-in users can edit. I'm not sure it will make sense from a legal standpoint. At least the old wiki seems to be OK? Any advise?
Mark Webb wrote: > +1. Although a full-time documentation person would have a hard time > keeping up. I tried for a while, but it was tough. > > > > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > some users (Frederic) suggested to create a dedicated JIRA for >> > documentation. Do you think it's a good idea to have a MINA-DOC JIRA >> entry ? >> > >> > Otherwise, I went to the MINA web page looking for some information about >> > the sources, and I found it quite difficult to find. IMHO, there should >> be a >> > 'source' link in the main menu, on the left, where you can find pointers >> to >> > the tarball distributions, the svn links and such. >> > >> >> +1 >> >> I'd like to see the site documentation improve and keep up with the >> changes. Another alternative to consider would be to create a module for >> the MINA JIRA project if people are fearful of a JIRA project explosion. >> >> Alex >> > > > -- Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat -- what we call human nature is actually human habit -- http://gleamynode.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
