Sorry, but I said ByteBuffer, I mean IoBuffer.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Craig L. Ching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:32 AM > To: dev@mina.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Current state of 2.0 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Emmanuel Lecharny > > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 10:23 AM > > To: dev@mina.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Current state of 2.0 > > > > Craig L. Ching wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > Hi Craig, > > > I've been sort of following some of the discussions of > the proposed > > > changes and I like what I'm hearing. In fact, I'd love it > > if someone > > > could say how soon I could expect to see a release of all > the good > > > ideas > > > ;-) > > > > > Well, soon ... :) We don't have any deadline, we are just > processing > > tasks as fast as we can. > > > > However, as it's a volunteer effort, we have a limited > time, but the > > good point is that we welcome any help ! > > > > So if you feel like you can give us a hand to deliver 2.0 > earlier, you > > are very welcome :) > > Of course ;-) I'll probably be more involved in testing it > once it's ready though :-P > > > > Anyway, I'm coming back to a project that I had > originally working > > > with > > > 1.1.6 and had converted to 2.0 M1, but found a problem with > > that that > > > was promptly fixed on trunk at the time, around 17 March, > 2008. My > > > code worked with trunk then and what I'm wondering is what > > the chances > > > are that it will still work? Have any of the big changes > > you've all > > > been talking about been put on the trunk yet? I appreciate any > > > feedback, I know you're all busy, and if I don't hear > > anything, I'll > > > just give it my best shot, but I do appreciate any > > information I can get. > > > > > 2.0-M1 is just a milestone. Things can change before we get to > > 2.0-RC1, which will see the API frozen. Until then, it's > really likely > > that some refactoring could occur. So keep watching :) > > > > Yeah, I'm just wondering if there have been any commits yet > that have fundamentally changed the API's (ByteBuffer in > particular) that might "get" me if you know what I mean. I'm > fine with the changes I'm hearing, don't get me wrong, I'm > just trying to quantify (very loosely speaking) the work I'll > have to do when I do an svn update and build ;-) Thanks for > the reply! > > > Thanks ! > > > > > > -- > > -- > > cordialement, regards, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com > > directory.apache.org > > > > > > > Cheers, > Craig >
