Fowrarded, as I replied to Niklas only.
(Guys, don't 'reply all' ! When you do that, AFAIK, we can't anymore
do a simple 'reply', as it selects the original sender, instead of the
dev-list)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:52 AM
Subject: Re: Mina web site modified
To: Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dowloads should be close to project, IMO. There are already 7 items in
the resource menu, which is more or less the upper limit for standard
humans. And when you look at a project, the first thing you want to do
is to download it, and maybe later look at the doco (hmmm :).
The problem I have with roadmap is different : this is a MINA related
roadmap, and I agree it's not its place. As soon as FtpServer and
AsyncWeb have decent web site (which is the case for FtpServer), I
think we should also separate the MINA part from the main site, to
make the front page project agnostic. Then the roadmap could be moved
to a project specific documentation. Something like :
* Documentation
- Features
- Roadmap
- FAQ
- User guide
- Developpers guide ...
Then the front page would have those menus :
* Documentation
- Mina 1.0
- MINA 1.1
- MINA 2.0
- FtpServer 1.0
- AsyncWeb 1.0
Or even better :
* Documentation
- Mina
- FtpServer
- Asyncweb
with handling of versions into the specific pages for each project.
Somehow what we did on directoy.apache.org, as we have 3 products.
wdyt ?
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:13 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There is much more to do : I just mapped the menus to the existing pages.
>> Some links are missing (AsyncWeb, for instance). Some pages must be
>> splitted. Some pages must be created ('sources', etc)
>
> I think it's a great start! However, there are some things I find
> confusing. How about moving "Downloads" and "Roadmap" from the
> "Projects" menu into the "Resources" menu? Makes more sense to me
> (MINA Downloads and Roadmap is not really downloads). Also, "FAQ"
> might be moved to "Resources" to clean up the "Documentation menu
> somewhat (would like to do the same thing with "Features" but not sure
> where it would fit). What do you think?
>
> /niklas
>
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
