On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:30 PM, David Latorre <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you know when it's likely that getCanonical* fails? Should we try a > workaround in that case? If you think our code is ok as is, that's much > better!
I have no idea, which is why I choose to throw the exception. I'm also okay with swallowing the exception and returning null like you did, if we add a logging statement on WARN level. /niklas
