>> >> One thing that can be done meanwhile is upload the XMPP compliance >> report on wiki. > > Did you get it to work?? I never managed to run the ant apt task > properly, I had to use the command line apt with lots of workarounds > (Might be due to me using MaOSX or something).
Not yet, just browsing the code. will give it a shot > >> I did saw the compliance package, and its really great way of >> capturing Spec compliance. > > +1. If you put the generated HTML into the javadoc root, all the links > should also work. > >> We can do something similar for FtpServer and SSHD (typically for >> project where we need RFC compliance). >> >> Meanwhile, as we wait for the Voting and other formalities to >> complete, here are possible directions to work spend our energies >> 1. Generic XML Codec - We can work towards making a generic XML Codec >> and may be make it as part of MINA Core. In Vysper, we can reuse the >> same. > > +1. XMPP uses a subset of XML, so Vysper's current impl is sufficent > for now. I think this is a worthwhile thing to do, and will > definitively participate in the discussion, but I lack time and > energie to help with coding. Don't worry about this, our community is very active. Check this out http://www.nabble.com/XML-Pull-Parser-based-XML-Decoder-implementation-td23022865.html > >> 2. Can think of some suitable place for Spec compliance package and >> try to see possible use in other projects > > +1 > >> 3. Wiki is a definite candidate to be worked upon. >> >> 4. Can try to see the possible use of State Machine decoder, while >> decoding XML or alternatively see how we extend and use a streaming >> parser. >> >> 5. Some benchmarking shall be a good to have. We will be competing >> with Openfire (hope have picked the right name), which again use MINA >> for transport layer. > > +1. All effort until now went into making it spec compliant (ongoing), > no time into making it performant. To catch up with Openfire will be a > lot of work (an understatement). I think at first we will run into > simple obstacles. And yes, this is perhaps one of the most important > todos. I guess we can work this out. We have a very active community to help us out here. > >> Trying to understand the code a little more. > > Let me know where you need more explanation. I did worked on XMPP, during a POC. Been through openser, Openfire. The number for specs on XMPP scared me away ;-) -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
