Michael Jakl wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 22:52, Bernd Fondermann <bf_...@brainlounge.de> wrote: >> For the pubsub module, I'd propose to >> >> + move the 'general' and 'owner' package to 'handler', or, >> alternatively, move the handler classes they contain to two new >> 'handler' sub-packages respectively. > > +1, I wasn't happy with "general" anyways. What about .handler for the > current "general" package and .handler.owner for the #owner namespace?
+1 I can do it, if this proves to be too cumbersome to do in a patch. >> + rename test case classes to *TestCase or *Test so they are clearly >> identifyable as such by their name. If you use a view where all classes >> from one package are shown together even if they are on different dirs, >> this would be a big help. > > +1, the ant task will also profit from the "right" naming. Great, thanks. Bernd
