Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> Ashish wrote: >> >>>> All or most files have been changed. >>>> >>>> I'd recommend to re-create the branch to reduce merge efforts later. >>>> >>> Feel free to create one. I am yet to start work on it. >>> Tied with my work right now. >>> >> >> So, should I remove the branch and we'll create it again when somebody >> is actually going to work on it, how does that sound? I see no point in >> an aging branch nobody is committing to. >> > Having done such a move (for Directory, 1.1.7 -> 2.0.0), my experience > is that it should be done in one shot, when you have time to do it. In > my case, it took 2 months because I was quite busy and there were deadly > bugs in MINA I had to fix. But as MINA has stabilized since then, my > estimation of a move to MINA 2.0 is that it should take a couple of > days, may be less if you know how MINA work. Probably less than a few > hours too. > > So just do it in a branch *when* you are ready to do the migration (you > = anyone feeling the mood and having the time to do the migration).
The MINA code in Vysper is only a small portion of the code.Doing this as a side-project should not be as critical as refactoring over the whole codebase. Steady re-integration of TRUNK into the branch should help reducing pains, too. > > In the mean time, it's probably better to delete the branch. Dead wood > is heavy to carry :) +1. done. Bernd
