I agree with Dave Roberts - On STOR, tranform CRLFs to local EOL. On RETR, transform local EOL to CRLF. Absolutely no other changes.
Sai Pullabhotla www.jMethods.com On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Dave Roberts < dave.robe...@saaconsultants.com> wrote: > David Latorre wrote: > > So unless someone has a strong reason to need uniform EOLs > > > > corresponding to the target system, then we might assume that the > > > > issue with different clients resulting in different files can be > > > > ignored, and transform only the canonical line ending. > > My understanding of the spec has always been that in ASCII mode, > both sides must convert between the local OS specific line endings > and the canonical CR/LF pairing. If the file isn't in the correct > format for the local OS, then the right results cannot be guaranteed. > > So I would agree that we should only transform to/from the canonical > line ending. >