Between work and school, I have been really busy. I have been keeping up with the mailing list, but not doing much with the code. Things are starting to shake loose for me, so I will be able to jump back in now.
What do you see as the major roadblocks to releasing 2.0? On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny<elecha...@apache.org> wrote: > Mark Webb wrote: >> >> What are the plans for release of 2.0 and the migration to a 3.0 >> development? Is anyone prototyping any of these ideas in sandboxes? >> > > Hi Mark, > > those are just random thoughts I put down on the site after having posted > them to the list. I wrote them during my long commute from house to my > client's office. > > Right now, there is nothing started, except a few experiment in some > branches (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/branches/mina-new-chain2 ) > done a few months ago. > > The main target is still to get MINA 2.0 out asap, and it takes forever, > because a few peeps are working on it, something I can understand. MINA 2.0 > code is far from being perfect, and it's not very funny to try to fix bugs > in it, as the inner documentation is pretty sparse, and you have to double > guess what some portion of the code is supposed to do before trying to fix > it. > > My idea, when I posted this 3.0 mail, was to try to get more excitation from > all of the people musing around MINA. It's always fun to start a new > version, and it's most certainly useful to see what people have in mind, > instead of going forward, code and commit. > > It will take a couple of months before MINA 2.0 will be released (after a > couple of RC), and I think we are close to the final version. Seems to be > good timing to start thinking seriously about MINA 3.0 ! > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
