[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Edouard De Oliveira updated DIRMINA-612:
----------------------------------------
Component/s: (was: Web Site / Documentation)
Handler
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-RC1)
2.0.0-M7
1 - These classes are pretty well documented
2 - They're badly named as the 'real handler' is in fact the
SingleSessionIoHandlerDelegate and not the SingleSessionIoHandler.
As we have freezed the API can we still rename these as it is the source of the
confusion ?
3 - Is it really a good idea to provide this package as it goes against
scalability principles ? should we remove it completly ? for 2.0 ? 3.0 ? or
just document the fact that it can suffer scalability problems (which would be
compliant with api freeze) and maybe even mark these as deprecated ?
WDYT ?
> Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-612
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-612
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Handler
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M2
> Reporter: Geert Schuring
> Assignee: Edouard De Oliveira
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M7
>
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> A normal multi-session IoHandler can be added to the acceptor using the
> "addHandler" method. However, when writing a single-session IoHandler I can't
> find any information about how to register it with the acceptor. The
> "addHandler" method doesn't accept single-session IoHandlers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
