In practice this is true. But in this instance we do nothing.
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Edouard De Oliveira wrote:
The point is to react differently in case of different exceptions
but exceptions must be sorted from specific exceptions to generic ones
it can also be done by catching exception and using instanceof
statements
my 2 cents :)
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
Blog: http://tedorgwp.free.fr
WebSite: http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mar 19 Janvier 2010, 16 h 12 min 41 s
Objet : Re: Not sure why...
org.apache.mina.transport.socket.apr.AprIoProcessor
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Ashish wrote:
Where did u pulled this out from ?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com
> wrote:
try {
doSomeStuff();
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
throw e;
} catch (Error e) {
throw e;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeIoException("Failed to create a
pollset.", e);
} finally {
cleanUp();
}
What's the point in catching and re-throwing RuntimeException and
Error?
Regards,
Alan
--thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
