On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 08:04, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > Alan D. Cabrera a écrit : >> >> On Jan 21, 2010, at 7:28 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 18:42, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 13:25, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 20, 2010, at 2:23 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:56, Emmanuel Lecharny >>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bernd Fondermann a écrit : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> AFAIR, using Google Analytics has been discouraged by the ASF >>>>>>>>> board. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ok, found the thread (and I confirm that thunderbird is a POS when t >>>>>>>> comes >>>>>>>> to search, compared to gmail). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would not say that the ASF board discouraged the usage of GA, >>>>>>>> there >>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>> some mails echanged about the legal implication on the usage of GA : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "the Google >>>>>>>> Terms and Conditions (Paragraph 7 on >>>>>>>> http://www.google.com/analytics/tos.html) require all sites using >>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>> Analytics to post a privacy policy: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- cut --- >>>>>>>> You will have and abide by an appropriate privacy policy and will >>>>>>>> comply >>>>>>>> with all applicable laws relating to the collection of information >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> visitors to Your websites. You must post a privacy policy and that >>>>>>>> policy must provide notice of your use of a cookie that collects >>>>>>>> anonymous traffic data. >>>>>>>> --- cut --- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> " >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So the bare minimum for us would be to post this policy on our web >>>>>>>> site. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, if the board say "don't use it", we will remove it, of course. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bernd, do you have any other mail I may have missed, suggesting that >>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>> prefer us not to use GA? (forward them to me privately, to preserve >>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>> privacy). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks ! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, right. Now I remember fully. You phrased this correctly, >>>>>>> project's >>>>>>> are advised to let their user's know. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for RTFBR, I should have checked the facts myself >>>>>>> beforehand, >>>>>> >>>>>> Where do we publish our reports? >>>>> >>>>> Publicly, here >>>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/ >>>>> as soon as they are approved by the board. >>>>> >>>>> ASF members can enjoy them in full detail at the private svn repo >>>>> shortly after the meeting - think "EAP", but the lag is no longer as >>>>> big as it used to be. >>>> >>>> Sorry, I meant the Google Analytics reports. :) >>> >>> Oh... <blush/> :-) >> >> :) >> >> Are these reports published? > > No but you can have a look at them here : > > https://www.google.com/analytics/settings/?et=reset&hl=en#scid=11074178
I cannot see anything following this URL. I think the Analytics user must share by adding the person's google account to the analytics profile. That's the way it worked a few years back with JAMES. Bernd > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.nextury.com > > >
