On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 18:23, Bogdan Ciprian Pistol <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann > <[email protected]> wrote: >> And if we evaluate AsyncWeb we might come to the conclusion to use it, >> since it's easy for us to maintain it. >> This could be done in the scope of GSoC. Is this planned? I figure >> that the implementation itself might not take the whole summer and >> there might be time to prepend a technology study. > > In the proposal it is planned that in the community bonding period > prototyping study will be done.
The GSoC proposal is not public, unfortunately. > I think you can consider that the prepended technology study is > included in the prototyping period. > >> So I like to rewind myself and ask a question: >> What approach should we use for HTTP CM <-> XMPP Server communication? > > I agree with Niklas that option a. is appropriate to start with. +1 Bernd
