I think we should also try to make the tests stable. Hudson builds on windows seem to be failing more than they pass. It took us a very long time to reach 2.0.0. That's why I wonder if we shouldn't spend just a little more time to get these things right ?
Hmm, on the other hand, we could start applying the "release early, release often" philosophy from now on ;-) I am well aware of the fact that I have contributed near to nothing for far too long, and I hope my comments are not offending anyone. regards, Maarten On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@apache.org>wrote: > On 9/13/10 10:54 PM, Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny<elecha...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> [X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0 >>> >> I got some minor issues with the distribution packages, but nothing >> stopping this release. Otherwise, I think it's looking good. >> > yes, we could do better. Like Niklas suggested, releasing a source packaged > separated from the bin package would be way better. > > I think we can go on with the current release, and fix things in a 2.0.1 > asap. > > > > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > >
