On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> All I did was >> >> mvn rat:check -fn > > To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from > target/site/rat-report.html, which I did. > > Summary > ------- > Notes: 0 > Binaries: 4 > Archives: 0 > Standards: 639 > > Apache Licensed: 613 > Generated Documents: 0 > > JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional > Generated files do not required license headers > > 26 Unknown Licenses > > > > There are some missing ASL header in the following files : > > !????? mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/proxy/utils/MD4.java > !????? > mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/core/service/AbstractIoServiceTest.java > !????? > mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoadTestMdcInjectionFilter.java > !????? mina-legal/src/main/resources/notices.xml > > Should we abort the release once more for those 4 files, two of them having > been added whiel I was fighting with Maven, or can we wait for a 2.0.1 ? > > Frankly, I would rather release a 2.0.1 immediately than going through the > 2.0.0 vote again. > > wdyt ?
My -1 for vote again. IMHO, we go for a release. Create a JIRA for this and address it in 2.0.1 People are waiting for a GA. thanks ashish
