Nope, went in favor of nbxml parser module in vysper. Since it already provides xml parsing, adding another example won't do much good.
The only thing that happened was I blogged about it. thanks ashish On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Mark Webb <elihusma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ashish, > > Did you ever post this code to the repository? > > Thanks, > Mark > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Niklas Gustavsson >> <nik...@protocol7.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> great ! We have to make it an independent module in MINA then, because it's >>>> really the XML parser we want to use for any kind of XML based protocol in >>>> MINA ! >>> >>> Right, that would be easy enough. It's designed to be independent on >>> Vysper. However, it currently only implements the limited subset of >>> XML that XMPP uses. So, for generic XML usage, further development >>> would be needed (like comments, doctype, PIs). >>> >> >> I think it should be fine to start with :) users will have something >> to start with. >> >> Coming back to my dumb question, about adding an XML example along >> with MINA examples. >> I see two ways >> 1. Implement a codec (fork from Vysper and refine) and use it in the example. >> 2. Provide a simple example and continue to work on #1 >> >> I see no harm in providing an example with 2.0.X series and have more >> robust codec in 3.0. >> >> - ashish -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
