Thanks,
Mike -- Michael Bean (Mike) Alcatel-Lucent AAA Product Group 3461 Robin Ln, Ste 1 Cameron Park, CA 95682 Email: [email protected] Phone: 1 530 350 6564 Fax: 1 530 672 1757
Rather than block waiting for server to close channel after executing a
command, I would like to be notified by close handler or some other
callback. It would appear if I had the ability to get CloseFuture
without actually closing channel, I could add listener to see sever
close channel but no such call exists. Also don't see any way to
replace request handler to schedule processing say exit-status. Looking
through code, waitFor( int mask, long timeout) in AbstractClientChannel
appears to be only way to be notified of a state change. Please let me
know if I'm missing anything here. Would like to avoid blocking a
client thread waiting for command to complete.
- SSHD: No alternative to waitFor() in AbstractClient... Bean, Michael J (Mike)
- Re: [COMMERCIAL] SSHD: No alternative to waitF... Bean, Michael J (Mike)
