2016-03-31 15:13 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com>: > Le 31/03/16 09:15, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > > We're still missing a few binding votes .... > > Damn.. Totally missed the last votes :/ > > > I have tested the package, and teh first time I got an error : > > Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.098 > sec <<< FAILURE! - in > > org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest > testCopyDataExtension[size=8,192, readOffset=4,096, readLength=2,048, > > writeOffset=4,096](org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest) > Time elapsed: 5.014 sec <<< ERROR! > org.apache.sshd.common.SshException: Failed to get operation result > within specified timeout: 5000 > at > > org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest.testCopyDataExtension(CopyDataExtensionImplTest.java:174) > at > > org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest.testCopyDataExtension(CopyDataExtensionImplTest.java:135) > at > > org.apache.sshd.client.subsystem.sftp.extensions.helpers.CopyDataExtensionImplTest.testCopyDataExtension(CopyDataExtensionImplTest.java:121) > > > > Re-running it twice, both were successful. >
Not sure if this is an environmental problem or not. Lyor, any idea ? > > Otherwise, I think there is a missing Copyright for jcraft, which is > part of the dependencies : > > "JZlib 0.0.* were released under the GNU LGPL license. Later, we have > switched > over to a BSD-style license. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Copyright (c) 2000,2001,2002,2003 ymnk, JCraft,Inc. All rights reserved. > > Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met: > > 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, > this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > > 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in > the documentation and/or other materials provided with the > distribution. > " > > > I know this should have been detected before, and that I (and many > others) haven't check that for years... Am I wrong ? > > Those dependencies are not distributed in any distribution, so I don't really see why their copyright / notice should be included. -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: gno...@redhat.com Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
