[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16634079#comment-16634079
]
Jonathan Valliere commented on DIRMINA-1095:
--------------------------------------------
Never mind, looks like MINA is virtualizing the DatagramChannel. I thought it
was creating new Sockets. The list of virtualized channels should really be
associated with the DatagramChannel and only loop on the NioSessions which
belong to that specific DatagramChannel. Need something like
`getManagedSessions(DatagramChannel)`.
> Seems like the management f UDP sessions is really unneficient
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-1095
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1095
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0.19
> Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.20
>
>
> When we process incoming UDP messages, we iterate over the activated
> {{SelectionKey}}s. That's ok, but for each one of them, we read the data and
> try to flush the scheduled messages. The loop where it's done seems to
> iterate on *all* the managed sessions, for each keys we are processing :
> {code:java}
> private void processReadySessions(Set<SelectionKey> handles) {
> Iterator<SelectionKey> iterator = handles.iterator();
> while (iterator.hasNext()) {
> SelectionKey key = iterator.next();
> DatagramChannel handle = (DatagramChannel) key.channel();
> iterator.remove();
> try {
> if (key.isValid() && key.isReadable()) {
> readHandle(handle);
> }
> if (key.isValid() && key.isWritable()) {
> for (IoSession session : getManagedSessions().values()) {
> scheduleFlush((NioSession) session);
> ...
> {code}
> There is no reason to do so. First, we should not iterate on all the managed
> sessions (we may have thousands), but only the sessions which have something
> to write, and we certainly should not do that for every active key...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
