On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:10 PM Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@apache.org> wrote:
> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 18:27, Jonathan Valliere <john...@apache.org> a > écrit : > > > I'd like to call a vote on the following proposal for branch changes for > > MINA. > > > > 1. Rename 2.1 to 2.1.X because 2.1 is our root branch from which 2.1.1 > > and 2.1.2 spawn. The HEAD of 2.1.X should represent the current > > unreleased > > version in the 2.1 track. > > > +1 > > > > 2. Rename 2.0 to 2.0.X because 2.0 is our root branch from which > 2.0.16+ > > spawn. The HEAD of 2.0.X should represent the current unreleased > > version > > in the 2.0 track. > > > +1 > > > > 3. Remove 2.1.0 because it tracks 2.1.X and prefer to use tags for > > specific versions unless there is a specific reason why new > maintenance > > branches are > > > Being far from my computer, I can’t check what this 2.1.0 is. From the top > of my head, it’s a tag, but if it’s a branch, then it’s bad. We need to > clarify that. 2.1.0 is a branch currently. Update proposal to remove the 2.1.0 branch after making sure 2.1 and 2.1.0 are at the same HEAD. > > Thanks for the proposals, they make a lot if sense. > > We probably should also decide something related to 3.X: I don’t think it > will go any farther, and we may need this 3.X for the future evolutions. > -- > Regards, > Cordialement, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected from disclosure.
