Yes, I agree. On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 3:24 PM Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan, > > yes I think this is the right move. > > The current 2.2.X shoulld move to a 4.0.X branch, to become an offical 4.0. > > I also think that there is no reason to move with faster major versions > (à la Chrome or FF) > > In any case, we will keep the 2.0 and 2.1 branches alive for a bit of time. > > Also note that it may make sense to support Java 11+ only for 4.0. > > wdyt ? > > On 22/01/2022 17:05, Jonathan Valliere wrote: > > Hello friends, > > > > After some discussion, the breaking changes in the current 2.2.X branch > > necessitates moving to a new major version. One would expect a move to > > 3.0 however, a 3.0 branch and tags were created many years ago for an > > abandoned effort to re-engineer the entirety of MINA. The prospect of > > this is not lost but for the time being that old work is now defunct. > > Long story short, 2.2.X is moving to 4.0.X. > > > > Thank you for your patience. Some new Quality of Life changes are > > coming soon as well as an official 4.0 release. > > > > Cheers, > > JV > > -- > *Emmanuel Lécharny - CTO* 205 Promenad > <https://www.google.com/maps/search/%0A*Emmanuel+L%C3%A9charny+-+CTO*+205+Promenad?entry=gmail&source=g>e > des Anglais – 06200 NICE > T. +33 (0)4 89 97 36 50 > P. +33 (0)6 08 33 32 61 > emmanuel.lecha...@busit.com https://www.busit.com/ >
