[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17757242#comment-17757242 ]
Emmanuel Lécharny commented on DIRMINA-1172: -------------------------------------------- Hi Alexander, may I ask you to provide a fully functionnal test? It will spare me the time to recreate something I can test. Thanks! > Multiple DatagramAcceptors and the creation of a session object > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DIRMINA-1172 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1172 > Project: MINA > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 2.1.5 > Reporter: Alexander B > Priority: Major > Attachments: UDPTest4.java > > > Hello, > I am using two independently created NioDatagramAcceptors, which are created > by the following code : > {code:java} > AbstractIoService inputSource = new NioDatagramAcceptor(); > ((NioDatagramAcceptor) inputSource).getSessionConfig().setReuseAddress(true); > DefaultIoFilterChainBuilder filterChainBuilderUDP = > ((NioDatagramAcceptor)inputSource).getFilterChain(); > filterChainBuilderUDP.addLast("logger", new LoggingFilter()); > ((NioDatagramAcceptor) > inputSource).getSessionConfig().setIdleTime(IdleStatus.READER_IDLE, > getIdleTimeout()); > ((NioDatagramAcceptor) inputSource).setHandler(this); > try { > ((NioDatagramAcceptor)inputSource).bind(new InetSocketAddress(port)); > } catch (IOException e) { > log.error("Failed to connect {}", e); > } > {code} > One Acceptor is listening on port 9800, the other one on 9801. If I now send > UDP packages (from a external application) to both ports (independently). It > seems, that both UDP port are "connected" to the same session. > Information: The external app is sending: > Message "TEST_1 <timestamp>" just to port 9800 > Message "TEST_2 <timestamp>" just to port 9801 > The overwritten method messageReceived will give the following output: > {code:java} > public void messageReceived(IoSession session, Object message) throws > Exception { > String msgStr = message.toString(); > log.info("SessionId:" + session.getId() + " " + msgStr); > } > {code} > 2023-04-19_11:47:35.035 [NioDatagramAcceptor-2] INFO - SessionId:1 TEST_1 > 1681904855701 > 2023-04-19_11:47:35.035 [NioDatagramAcceptor-3] INFO - SessionId:1 TEST_2 > 1681904855701 > So, both messages (for port 9800 and port 9801) are received by SessionId1. > If I do exactly the same with `NioSocketConnector`, I can see two different > sessions, such that both messages are handled independently: > 2023-04-19_11:44:35.725 [NioProcessor-11] INFO - SessionId:1 TEST_1 > 1681904875701 > 2023-04-19_11:44:37.754 [NioProcessor-15] INFO - SessionId:2 TEST_2 > 1681904875701 > Is there anything I did not mention in the context of UDP/DatagramAcceptor? > Or is there any setting, such that DatagramAcceptors can create/handle their > own session objects? -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org