+1

verified build on M1 Mac

Java 11 - Build ok
Java 8 - Build ok


On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 12:21 PM Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I'm sorry, I should have been more specific ;-)
>
> The page https://mina.apache.org/sshd-project/downloads.html and all Mina
> download pages refer to both SHA 256 and 512. We only need to link to the
> 512 file.
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2023, 2:23 PM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not sure what you're referring to.
> > The web site doc for the sha generation is correct (I just messed up the
> > command)
> >
> >
> >
> https://mina.apache.org/mina-project/developer-guide.html#step-12-deploy-web-reports-javadoc-and-jxr
> > and the web site itself is usually updated after the release:
> >
> >
> >
> https://mina.apache.org/mina-project/developer-guide.html#step-12-deploy-web-reports-javadoc-and-jxr
> > Am I missing something ?
> >
> > Guillaume
> >
> > Le sam. 14 oct. 2023 à 20:02, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Hi Guillaume,
> > >
> > > Did you update the site generation as well?
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2023, 12:48 PM Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thx for pointing out the weird sha files.  I've fixed them and removed
> > the
> > >> sha256 ones.
> > >>
> > >> Guillaume
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le sam. 14 oct. 2023 à 17:13, Gary D. Gregory <[email protected]> a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >> > Hi All:
> > >> >
> > >> > +1
> > >> >
> > >> > I am reviewing the src zip file:
> > >> >
> > >> > - ASC OK
> > >> >
> > >> > - Can't validate SHA file with:
> > >> >     shasum --check apache-sshd-2.11.0-src.zip.sha512
> > >> >   This is due to non-standard format for the file.
> > >> >   Eyeballing the file looks OK when compared to shasum -a 512
> output.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > - IMO, the VOTE email should include a link to the KEYS file.
> > >> >   The KEYS file is not even listed on
> > >> > https://mina.apache.org/sshd-project/downloads.html
> > >> >   I had to go hunt for it:
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/mina/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > - Non-Blocker: Can't we just have SHA-512, instead of both SHA-512
> and
> > >> > SHA-256?
> > >> >
> > >> > - There is no way that I can tell if we've broken binary
> compatibility
> > >> (or
> > >> > source compatibility) since there is no use of japicmp (or revapi or
> > >> ...)
> > >> >
> > >> > - mvn apache-rat:check OK
> > >> >
> > >> > - mvn clean install OK
> > >> >
> > >> > - Using:
> > >> > Apache Maven 3.9.5 (57804ffe001d7215b5e7bcb531cf83df38f93546)
> > >> > Maven home: C:\java\apache-maven-3.9.5
> > >> > Java version: 17.0.8, vendor: Eclipse Adoptium, runtime: C:\Program
> > >> > Files\Eclipse Adoptium\jdk-17.0.8.7-hotspot
> > >> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252
> > >> > OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
> > "windows"
> > >> >
> > >> > Gary
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On 2023/10/12 14:33:37 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> > >> > > I've staged a candidate release for 2.11.0 at:
> > >> > > Official staging repo:
> > >> > >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/mina/sshd/2.11.0/
> > >> > > Maven staging repo:
> > >> > >
> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemina-1089
> > >> > > Git tag:
> > >> > >   https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/commits/sshd-2.11.0
> > >> > > Changelog:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/blob/sshd-2.11.0/docs/changes/2.11.0.md
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please review and vote !
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > ------------------------
> > >> > > Guillaume Nodet
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> ------------------------
> > >> Guillaume Nodet
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > ------------------------
> > Guillaume Nodet
> >
>


-- 
thanks
ashish

Reply via email to