Thank you Xiaojing and Chenyang.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 8:10 AM Chenyang Li <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ok sound good to me then
>
> +1
>
>         < = >
> LESS IS MORE
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 6:18 PM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Chenyang,
> >
> > You are right, how to optimize the ML/AI workload through non-volatile
> > objects is a big challenge.
> >
> > I saw some successful efforts on this domain, for example, Apache Arrow
> > provided optimized dataframe and numpy array to accelerate the data
> > processing, while they do have DLPack protocol to improve the efficiency
> of
> > tensors and arrays exchange between major frameworks.
> >
> > So that's why I think we might find the similar path to ML/AI workloads,
> > thanks.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Gordon
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM Chenyang Li <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Ml/ai will be interesting to add, but the problem is I don’t see a
> clear
> > > interception from Mnemonic project.
> > >
> > > Does anybody have any ideas on this?
> > > Chenyang
> > >
> > >         < = >
> > > LESS IS MORE
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 9:58 AM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Mnemonic contributors and PMCs,
> > > >
> > > > As the benefits of non-volatile memory technology are very limited on
> > its
> > > > own, we may need to consider developing some applications to present
> > it,
> > > > such as ML/AI. so I would like to call a vote to make a community
> wide
> > > > decision on this new direction for Mnemonic, please vote, and we can
> > > > definitely do further discussion on it after it, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly,
> > > >
> > > > [] +1 approve
> > > > [] +0 no opinion
> > > > [] -1 disapprove  with a reason
> > > >
> > > > Thank you all for your participation.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Gordon
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 11:56 PM Gordon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Dear Sander,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry for the late reply, I submitted the report for the Mnemonic
> > > > > community and will discuss with our PMCs to make a decision on the
> > > > > direction of our project/community, thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > > Gordon.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 6:19 AM Sander Striker <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Dear Mnemonic community,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In the Apache governance model, the ASF board delegates
> > responsibility
> > > > for
> > > > >> managing projects to PMCs. This allows projects to govern
> > themselves,
> > > in
> > > > >> terms
> > > > >> of their own development goals, guidelines, and volunteer spirit,
> > > within
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> scope of our purpose as an open source foundation. The state
> allows
> > us
> > > > to
> > > > >> supply an umbrella of corporate protection to our projects and
> > > > >> volunteers, but
> > > > >> only to the extent that we retain active and effective oversight
> of
> > > each
> > > > >> project's operation on behalf of the public's interest.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> To enable the board to provide oversight across the foundation,
> each
> > > PMC
> > > > >> is
> > > > >> tasked with providing the board a quarterly report on the health
> of
> > > > their
> > > > >> project. This allows us to hear your heartbeat, to see the project
> > > > through
> > > > >> your eyes, and to inform the public through our meeting minutes.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The board has noticed that the reports for Mnemonic have been
> missed
> > > > >> for a number of months. This makes us sad because we have lost
> that
> > > > >> ability
> > > > >> to communicate with you, to see what may be preventing your good
> > > health,
> > > > >> and to ensure that we are providing the services that you need to
> > > > continue
> > > > >> as an Apache project.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The reports to the board are normally written by the PMC chair but
> > all
> > > > PMC
> > > > >> members have an individual responsibility to ensure that a report
> is
> > > > >> submitted. If the PMC chair is not available then any PMC member
> can
> > > > >> submit
> > > > >> the report. If you need help with this process, please reach out
> to
> > > > >> [email protected]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please ensure that a report for Mnemonic is submitted to the board
> > > > >> for the next meeting on Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 21:00 UTC.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If the PMC chair is not going to be available for an extended
> period
> > > of
> > > > >> time,
> > > > >> it may make sense to rotate the PMC chair. Rotating the PMC chair
> > does
> > > > not
> > > > >> mean the current chair has failed. People's situations and
> interests
> > > > >> change;
> > > > >> rotation is good as it allows more people to become familiar with
> > that
> > > > >> role.
> > > > >> Again, if assistance is required with this process, please feel
> free
> > > to
> > > > >> reach out to [email protected]
> > > > >>
> > > > >> As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where
> activity
> > > > >> reduces
> > > > >> to a level that the project is no longer sustainable. At Apache,
> > > > projects
> > > > >> reach this stage when there are no longer 3 active PMC members
> > > providing
> > > > >> oversight. Projects that reach this stage are placed in our Attic,
> > > where
> > > > >> they continue to be accessible to the public but are not portrayed
> > as
> > > > >> having
> > > > >> an active community for maintenance.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>     http://attic.apache.org/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If Mnemonic has reached this point, please reach out to the Attic
> > > > project
> > > > >> to arrange transfer. On the other hand, if your project is mostly
> > > > dormant
> > > > >> but
> > > > >> still has at least three active PMC members, it can remain in that
> > > state
> > > > >> for
> > > > >> as long as needed. If your project is in such a state, please
> > mention
> > > > >> that in
> > > > >> your report and verify the PMC's state at regular intervals.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Finally, if you have any questions, please feel free to reach out
> to
> > > > >> [email protected].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > >> The ASF Board
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to