Hi, Gary

are you preparing 0.5.0 release now or the 0.4.0 vote is still in progress?
is it possible to give us a few highlights on what's new in the new
release?

Thanks
yanping

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 - xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean, was able to compile/install most of
> the modules (on a mac so filtered off a few I don't have deps for).
>
> Patrick
>
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a call for a releasing Apache Mnemonic
> > 0.4.0-incubating, release candidate 1. This
> > is the fourth release of Mnemonic incubating.
> >
> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 4.0-incubating-rc1/src/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon is v0.4.0-incubating:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.4.0-incubating
> >
> > The release hash is 178035c68f1df26e4f3fcf9314bb6248c2ad3ac0:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-
> > mnemonic.git;a=commit;h=7799e7094545db9640269d14543bf28d7a7e0335
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > KEYS file available:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/KEYS
> >
> > For information about the contents of this release, see:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/mnemonic/0.
> > 4.0-incubating-rc1/CHANGES.txt
> >
> > The vote will be open for ~72 hours.
> > Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> > including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  The
> > please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as apache-mnemonic-0.4.0-incubating
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
> >
> > Very truly yours,
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to