Javier, I think most of this will be handled by the infrastructure - depending on what exactly a developer is working on, there may be some impact, but for most well designed apps this will be just a detail.
/D On 7/28/08 2:06 AM, "Javier Gálvez Guerrero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, Ubuntu base stack won't be used anymore, will it? > > Which will be the consequences for those developers who are interested in > coding end-user applications? Just MIC will make this underlying software > infrastructure switch transparent to them? Will the same libraries and tools > (Gstreamer, GTK+, Madwifi,...) be supported and available to develop in Moblin > 2? > > > Sorry if I misunderstood anything (probably). Thank you for your answers, > Javi > > > > 2008/7/28 Dirk Hohndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> The press loves anything that sounds like a controversy. >> In my keynote I mentioned that Moblin 2 would start from a Fedora base - and >> that this was driven by a few features in RPM as well as in the build system >> that we intend to use. >> >> This has nothing to do with "dropping" anything - it's simply a matter of >> the infrastructure we want to use. >> >> /D >> >> >> On 7/27/08 8:00 PM, "Mitsutaka Amano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>> Hi Ian, >>>> >>>> I'm a MIC commiter. We will implement the RPM full support. >>>> So I thought that moblin 2.0 will take a RPM support. >>>> >>>> Maybe we might be mistaken for this announce. >>>> I think that it's not switching and It's supporting. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> ======================================== >>>> Mitsutaka Amano >>>> MIRACLE LINUX CORPORATION >>>> ======================================== >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Ian Lawrence wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a simple question. Why will the moblin 2.0 switch from Ubuntu to >>>>>>>> Feodra? >>>>>>>> I would like to know RPM's advantage and DEB's fault more details. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> I do not really think it is a case of faults/advantages or that rpm is >>>>>> better or worse than deb but rather that it makes good sense for >>>>>> Moblin to work for a while on rpm compatibility. I am thinking here >>>>>> about the image creator utility specifically. >>>>>> Moblin is an upstream project for whoever wants the code (thats the >>>>>> beauty of open source) so the ubuntu guys can just package it in debs >>>>>> and <insert downstream distro> can package it in rpms. >>>>>> IMO headlines like 'Moblin drops Ubuntu' are more about shifting >>>>>> eyeballs to news sites than they are about anything that could >>>>>> actually be useful to a reader >>>>>> If I was moblin I would wait a year and then 'drop' Fedora for say >>>>>> slackware and start to have some fun with the whole thing >>>>>> >>>>>> Ian >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
