Ok...give me an opportunity to get a kix in from Kris Bravo for JBoss
and I will initiate a vote.

Jeff

Brett Porter wrote:
> If they are in the wild, by all means polish them up and release them!
> (moving them to the sandbox svn area is unlikely to affect their uptake,
> really - but released is better if they are being used :)
> 
> - Brett
> 
> Jeff Genender wrote:
>> -1 on demotion...unless we can release before a said demotion...
>>
>> There are 2 (jspc and jboss) that are becoming used pretty heavily...and
>> I think a demotion would be a negative...since they have been out in the
>> wild for some time now.
>>
>> So should I enable a vote for those in another thread?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>> +1 to these, but let's make the sandbox plugins distinct.
>>>
>>> Let's also demote to the sandbox anything that hasn't had a release yet.
>>>
>>> - Brett
>>>
>>> Brian E. Fox wrote:
>>>> I've been looking at some plugins in the sandbox and I see some issues:
>>>>  
>>>> 1. If sandbox plugins deploy sites, (as they probably should so they get
>>>> some visability), the scm connections are wrong because they inherit
>>>> from the mojo parent.
>>>> 2. Some plugins have the name maven-xxx-plugin instead of xxx-maven-plugin
>>>> 3. Many plugins aren't even posted on the mojo site.
>>>>  
>>>> I'd like to have a vote on these issues:
>>>>  
>>>> 1a. Should we create a mojo-sandbox parent and have sandbox plugins
>>>> derive from here? This way we can set the scm urls and anything else
>>>> that comes along here. Only the parent section would need to change when
>>>> a plugin graduates from the sandbox.
>>>>  
>>>> - OR-
>>>>  
>>>> 1b. Keep deriving from mojo parent, but add instructions to site to tell
>>>> devs how to override the scm connection when added to sandbox and add
>>>> instructions to guidelines for release to have devs remember to remove
>>>> the override when graduating.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 2. Should we correct the plugin names?
>>>>  
>>>> 3. Should all sandbox plugins be added to the mojo sandbox site?
>>>>  
>>>> Thx.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  

Reply via email to