Ok I will do a summary.
I got 3 +1 and one +0, and would then like to proceed with the release. I Will not be able to do this this weekend, but will manage to do so early in the week. Thanks all of you for helping ensuring the quality got so good as is now before releasing Best regards Kaare Nilsen On 28/02/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +0 > > I've made improvements to the aspectJ compiler so it can be used in > the normal compile process instead of javac, but i've been so busy > that I couldn't test it. > http://svn.plexus.codehaus.org/trunk/plexus-components/plexus-compiler/plexus-compilers/plexus-compiler-aspectj/ > I'd like to implement the aspectj support that way, compilation uses > the standard maven compiler plugin using aspectj instead of javac and > for the rest of features use the aspectj plugin, but as I don't have > right now the time to do it I don't want to block other people work. > If later we implement it that way we can deprecate some of the > functionality in the plugin. > > Regards > > On 2/24/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to reopen the vote for releasing the aspectJ plugin. > > In the last vote, some comments surfaced, and I have now resolved all > > the issues and comments from that round. > > > > I also got time to finish the rest of the features planned for later > > releases, so the plugin could now, in my view, be considered as > > feature complete. > > > > So.. based on that i would like to graduate the plugin from the sandbox and > > make a first official 1.0-beta1 release > > > > I'll open up the vote for 72h, then provide a summary > > > > +1 from me > > > > > -- > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. > -- The Princess Bride >
