Raphaël Piéroni wrote: >> That sounds like maven-archetype-mojo, that creates a mojo. >> >> Why don't we just have a whole bunch of subprojects, and then categorise >> them on the front page? >> > Why do the maven repository was refactored into components, plugins, > archetypes ? ;)
I'm not saying anything about the svn structure. I think calling something publically the "Mojo Archetype subproject" is undesirable. I'd be fine with splitting mojo into /plugins/, /archetypes/, /components/ and /sandbox/ too. > I would also like the menu categorization. But why not using some expand > mechanism ? There will soon be a lot of plugins/archetypes/components to > show at the mojo index page. That's fine with me too. - Brett
