Jeff Genender wrote: >> After this, I'd certainly +1 the release, but I don't want to see it >> happen before that. > > Sounds good. I am willing to change the JAXB jar location if you are > willing to help get the JAXB jars in the proper location. My hands are > somewhat tied as I would be pleased to refer to the proper JAXB jars if > they existed, since you have ultimate control there. Let me know the > groupId/artifactId you want and I will be happy to update the pom. Just > please help in getting the jars in their proper location.
Yep, that's all I was asking for - if you file an upload request for the new location someone such as myself will look after it. For JAXB1, the groupId "javax.xml" was used. Might be best to retain that consistency. Once they are up, I'll remove the openejb ones and leave the poms that point to the new one. - Brett
