On 4 Jan 07, at 4:30 PM 4 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
My objection is not that I can't check out c-build, it's that it
interrupts checking out the whole mojo-sandbox.
Ah, I didn't know Window just rolled up and died with a long path.
That's unbelievable.
Given that this has it's own trunk and branches, how about moving
this up to the top level (above the mojo trunk), instead of in the
sandbox?
Sure, we can do that.
jason.
- Brett
On 05/01/2007, at 12:39 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Please just leave them we're working on the constantly right now,
we're in a rush and we're all on unix. I don't care about Windows
right now and it's in the sandbox so it will have to remain like
that for the time being. It's not a priority right now. It's fine
for a requirement of getting out of the sandbox.
Please leave them alone for now.
Jason.
On 4 Jan 07, at 2:13 AM 4 Jan 07, Brett Porter wrote:
c-builds people - wdyt?
On 27/12/2006, at 1:51 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
John,
Can we shrink some of the artifact Id's in your tests? I can't
checkout mojo on windows due to 'resolve-existing-patch-artifact-
with-subpath' because it appears twice in the path, plus
everything else.
- Brett
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
