Hi Jason, I forgot to keep an eye on this conversation... I just tried
it, and yes it I can confirm that it is working for me, both with and
without verificiation. I give the thumbs up for this becoming a new
release. Thanks.

Rupert

On 2/27/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please try out 1.0-alpha-2-SNAPSHOT and provide feedback if this
version works for you or not.  If it looks okay, then I will start a
release vote... but I'm giving it a little bit to allow for feedback
on the new snap first.

--jason


On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:07 AM, Rupert Smith wrote:

> I noticed the current SNAPSHOT version has upgraded to retrotranslator
> 1.2.1 but the current release 1.0-alpha -1 is on an older version. Any
> plans to cut a new release from the current SNAPSHOT soon?
>
> Rupert
>
> On 2/12/07, Rupert Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nice work Dillon, I'm happy now I have things working with the
>> current
>> version. Looking forward to the new version too, when it comes.
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rupert
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yup, this is exactly what I do now...  There are some plans to
>> add some
>> support to this in the plugin itself:
>> >
>> >
>> >      http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-428
>> >
>> >
>> > --jason
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Feb 8, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Rupert Smith wrote:
>> >
>> > Actually I got it working with:
>> >
>> >             <plugin>
>> >                 <groupId>org.codehaus.mojo</groupId>
>> >
>> <artifactId>build-helper-maven-plugin</artifactId>
>> >                 <executions>
>> >                     <execution>
>> >                         <id>attach-artifacts</id>
>> >                         <phase>package</phase>
>> >                         <goals>
>> >                             <goal>attach-artifact</goal>
>> >                         </goals>
>> >                         <configuration>
>> >                             <artifacts>
>> >                                 <artifact>
>> >                                     <file>${
>> project.build.directory}/${project.build.finalName}-retro1.4.jar</
>> file>
>> >                                     <type>jar</type>
>> >                                     <classifier>
>> retro1.4</classifier>
>> >                                 </artifact>
>> >                             </artifacts>
>> >                         </configuration>
>> >                     </execution>
>> >                 </executions>
>> >             </plugin>
>> >
>> > Any plans to build this extra step into the retrotranslator itself?
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/8/07, Rupert Smith < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > I have succesfully used the retrotranslator plugin to
>> translate my main
>> build .jar into a seperate one (named - java1.4.jar). Now I need a
>> way to
>> publish that jar (in parallel to the non-retrotranslated one) as a
>> different
>> artifact type. There is a comment in the MOJO-28 Jira from Jason
>> Dillan
>> about this:
>> > >
>> > > Jason Dillon [14/Jul/06 05:52 PM]
>> > > >I had originally attempted to add this... but this breaks
>> down when
>> converting entire trees of jar files.
>> > >
>> > > >So, I had opted to just use the buildhelper plugin to add
>> artifacts for
>> publishing when needed.
>> > >
>> > > >But... I think that its probably a good idea to support
>> something like
>> that w/o the buildhelper... just pending how to best implement it.
>> > >
>> > > Does this work? Any help on how to get it to work? If it can't
>> be done
>> this way, I will gladly submit a patch to the retrotranslator
>> plugin to get
>> this working in the way that I need.
>> > >
>> > > - Rupert
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > [ Show ยป ]
>> > > Jason Dillon [14/Jul/06 05:52 PM ] I had originally attempted
>> to add
>> this... but this breaks down when converting entire trees of jar
>> files. So,
>> I had opted to just use the buildhelper plugin to add artifacts for
>> publishing when needed. But... I think that its probably a good
>> idea to
>> support something like that w/o the buildhelper... just pending
>> how to best
>> implement it.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

Reply via email to