Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
My experiences with the release of the Mojo Parent POM 17 make me propose
to move the parent stuff into a dedicated directory like illustrated
below:
trunk/
mojo/
mojo-parent/ <- Parent POM in here, please
So far, we have
+1: B. Bentmann, P. Gier, R. Piéroni, D. Tran
for the move in general.
Just in case we can agree on that directory move, some name proposals for
the directory:
a) mojo
b) mojo-parent
c) parent
a) D. Tran
b) P. Gier, R. Piéroni
I would prefer some more responses on this before I go ahead. Aside from
personal preferences, does anybody know of outstanding Maven issues that
would haunt us if we break with the convention of using the artifact id for
the directory name (e.g. inheritance problems)?
Benjamin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
