And couldn't we use Nemo instance ?
Arnaud

On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Freddy Mallet <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> Hi Rémy,
>
> We'd be glad to support Codehaus guys in order to set up and maintain their
> own Sonar instance as we do with Nemo (http://nemo.sonar.codehaus.org).
> I'm
> going to forward this email to Ben.
>
> Regards,
> Freddy
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Freddy Mallet
> Sonar.codehaus.org
> http://twitter.com/FreddyMallet
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Remy Sanlaville wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > I don't know if an continuous integration server is available yet.
> >> Yes, there is at ...
> >>
> >> http://bamboo.ci.codehaus.org/
> >>
> >
> > Nice !
> > A (little) document seems to be here
> > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/HAUSMATES/Continuous+Integration
> >
> > You need to raise a JIRA if you wish to have plan creation privileges
> > granted to your project.
> > cf. http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS
> > [I do not have the karma in order to edit the page : add the link to
> JIRA.
> > If someone can do it...]
> >
> >
> >
> >> > For code analysis reporting, Sonar seems to be a really good
> candidate.
> >> > It would be nice to have a Sonar instance for codehaus.
> >> >
> >> > What do you think about this ?
> >> Positive, but I'd rather address questions like these to Ben et alias.
> >
> >
> > Ok, I contacted sonar-source team in order to put them in touch with Ben
> > et
> > alias.
> > Sonar-source team are interested but they want to be sure that the idea
> is
> > welcoming by the codehaus community. So do not hesitate to give your
> > feedback.
> > +1 for me
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rémy
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-Proposition--Software-Factory-for-codehaus-tp22966701p23060029.html
> Sent from the mojo - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>


-- 
Arnaud

Reply via email to