Absolutely. I've already succeeded with the two parent pom's, yours would be 
the first jar (isn't it exciting ;) )

 

I already noticed you followed the instructions. I hope everything is clear 
enough, otherwise let me know.

 

cheers, 

 

- Robert
 


From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:53:24 +0200
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Sonar maven plugin 1.0-beta-2

Robert, sonar mojo is now upgraded to mojo-parent 25. 
I would like to be sure that codehaus staging repositories are ready to be used 
now. Can I stage the release before restarting the vote ? 
Thank you



On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote:


The voting for the nexus/new parent should be in a separate thread as well. 
Right now the voting for the sonar-m-p is a bit spoiled...
 
- Robert
 


From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:58:11 +0200

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Sonar maven plugin 1.0-beta-2




ok, +1 too. You should maybe send a new email outside this thread. The "right 
person" you're looking for is maybe not interested in sonar ;-)



On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Julien Ponge <[email protected]> wrote:

Same as Evgeny:

+1 on all items.

Cheers




On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Evgeny Mandrikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> +1 for using nexus (staging and deploying) and for release mojo parent.
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 20:34, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> Last week I've asked Juven Xu to prepare the nexus repository of codehaus
>> for staging and deploying the mojo projects[1]
>> He has finished his part, so now it's up to us to finalize our part[2]
>> So before you can deploy the sonar-m-p, I think we have to update the
>> mojo-parent[3], which requires a vote as well.
>> I'd hoped one of the despots or someone with staging experience could pick
>> up MOJO-1553. We just have to make sure everyone is informed correctly, not
>> just by some wild guesses from me because the docs say so.
>> This shouldn't be a problem, it's just about finding the right person who
>> wants to do this.
>>
>> - Robert
>>
>> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2000
>> [2] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1553
>> [3]
>> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/HAUSMATES/Codehaus+Maven+Repository+Usage+Guide#CodehausMavenRepositoryUsageGuide-6.POMandsettingsconfig
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: [email protected]
>> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:03:46 +0200
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Sonar maven plugin 1.0-beta-2
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>> This new version makes sonar configuration easier when using a maven proxy
>> like Nexus or Archiva. Indeed no additional settings are required anymore !
>> Let's remind that the current version 1.0-beta-1 needs to declare a mirror
>> in maven settings (see the section "declare the maven internal repository
>> into Nexus").
>> This improvement requires Sonar 2.2+. It is automatically disabled when
>> using sonar 2.1 or less. The snapshot has been deployed.
>> Release notes:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11062&version=16625
>> The vote is open for 72 hours with a lazy consensus as usual.
>> Thanks
>>
>> Simon Brandhof
>> SonarSource.org
>> SonarSource.com
>> ---
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Evgeny Mandrikov aka Godin <http://godin.net.ru>
> http://twitter.com/_godin_
>



--
http://izpack.org/
http://jpz-log.info/
http://julien.ponge.info/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email




                                          

Reply via email to