Robert, I think you missed this statement "....I wrote a simple Maven plugin that will generate the documents providing that the user have Natural Docs installed on the system."
So as long as the plugin a friendly license type , it is OK -Dan On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote: > It looks like there's a licensing problem: > > From Natural Docs: > The licensing has been changed. Natural Docs has moved from version 2 of > the GPL to version 3 of the AGPL. I was planning to do this with 2.0 and > leave 1.x alone, but Prettify’s Apache license wouldn’t be compatible > otherwise so 1.x gets it too. I’ve also updated the license text in > numerous files to make explicit what I thought was always assumed: any > generated documentation you create is your own and not subject to the GPL. > The JavaScript and CSS files bundled with it are still part of Natural Docs, > but their licensing doesn’t apply to the documentation as a whole. > > It's not listed on the codehaus permitted licenses list > http://codehaus.org/customs/licenses.html > > - Robert > > >> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:59:39 -0300 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [mojo-dev] Natural Docs Maven Plugin >> >> Hi all, >> >> I need to generate some documentation for a project using Natural Docs. >> (http://www.naturaldocs.org/) To make this process explicit in my POM, >> I wrote a simple Maven plugin that will generate the documents providing >> that the user have Natural Docs installed on the system. >> >> I'd like to contribute this plugin to the sandbox. >> >> Any thoughts? >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Tim >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
